Joe Manchin says there is “no circumstance” in which he would support weakening filibuster.


West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin III, a key moderate Democrat, reaffirmed his vow to protect filibustering in the equally divided Senate on Wednesday and suggested his party repeatedly use a fast-track budget process to move the budget forward. legislation without Republican votes.

Mr Manchin has long been one of the strongest supporters of the 60-vote threshold needed to end debate in the Upper House, even as he threatens to derail key elements of President Biden’s agenda. Although he has already considered possible reforms to the procedural hurdle, he has repeatedly dismissed questions about what might prompt him to vote for the outright abolition of filibuster, even as the Democrats played out various scenarios in which he could give in.

In an opinion piece published in the Washington Post, Mr. Manchin pledged that there was “no circumstance in which I would vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster,” and he urged party leaders to compromise on legislation instead of trying to bypass Republican opposition. . Ten Republicans are currently needed to join all Democrats in a 50-50 Senate to pass major legislation as part of the regular process.

READ  Biden's Lesson on Green Stimulus' Past Failures: Going Even Further

The comments took on added significance after a senior Senate official on Monday issued guidelines that could allow Democrats to continue the accelerated budget reconciliation process at least once more before the end of the fiscal year on September 30. , after using it to pass Mr Biden’s nearly $ 1.9 trillion pandemic relief bill without any Republican votes.

“We will not solve our nation’s problems in one Congress if we are only looking for partisan solutions,” Manchin wrote. “Instead of focusing on eliminating filibuster or shortening the legislative process through budget reconciliation, now is the time to do our job.”

Pressure has mounted for Democrats to push further the boundaries of what a majority party can do unilaterally when it controls both houses of Congress and the White House, in order to keep a series of election promises. While Democrats do not yet have the voices to end filibustering, they have explored other avenues to ensure that Mr. Biden’s agenda becomes law.

In recent days, this has consisted of widening the frequency of reconciliations, which allows certain budgetary laws to release the two chambers by a simple majority vote. While Senate MP Elizabeth MacDonough appears to have endorsed the Democratic argument that they can use the process multiple times in a single fiscal year, it is still unclear how and when they might use these possible opportunities. , and why.

READ  Polls in Tamil Nadu: With AIADMK, DMK contesting most seats, bipolar nature of state politics is unlikely to change - Politics News, The US Express News

While Mr Manchin did not categorically refuse to support another use of the expedited reconciliation process, he challenged the two sides to work together and compromise on key pieces of legislation, including changes to the infrastructure and taxation. Any use of reconciliation would force Mr. Manchin – and virtually all Democrats in Congress – to stand united behind the legislation.

“Senate Democrats must avoid the temptation to abandon our fellow Republicans on important national issues,” Manchin wrote. “The Republicans, however, have a responsibility to stop saying no and participate in the search for a real compromise with the Democrats.”

While many questions remain about how Democrats could potentially use another chance at reconciliation, Mr. Biden and Congressional leaders insist they want to work with Republicans to reach compromises, especially on the vast $ 2 trillion infrastructure proposal that the White House just unveiled.

READ  North Korean threat forces balance with China

“There are things that we are working on together – some that we have adopted and some that we will pass,” Biden said on Wednesday. He suggested that a group of 10 Republican senators who were looking to compromise on their pandemic relief plan had not done enough to restart negotiations with their original $ 618 billion plan. “If they came up with a plan that did the essentials and it was a billion – three or four, two or three – that allowed me to have pieces of everything in there, I would have been ready to compromise, but they did not, ”he added.

The group of 10 Republican senators subsequently issued a joint statement Wednesday evening claiming that the proposal was “a first offer to the White House intended to open bipartite negotiations” which had instead been rejected “as totally inadequate in order to justify its decision. go-it – one strategy. “


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here