As SSDs are poised to become the default (and only) storage option for desktops as well as laptops, the market has filled with more affordable models. Even M.2 NVMe SSDs, which were originally exotic and expensive options only for enthusiasts, are now extremely common. As well as being faster than older SATA SSDs, they’re tiny, handy, and save you the mess of extra wires lying around inside your PC cabinet. There is clearly a market for entry-level NVMe SSDs today and Kingston is aiming for just that with its new NV series.
Kingston NV1 SSD Price in India
The Kingston NV1 SSD is equivalent to SATA-based A and UV series in terms of positioning. It’s available in 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB capacities, and it’s interesting that lower capacities aren’t offered even though it’s an entry-level model. SSD retail prices usually have nothing in common with the numbers printed on the labels and also vary often. In India the first two sell easily for around Rs. 5,499 and Rs. 9,499 respectively, while the 2TB version is not as widely available and will cost around Rs. 24,500 which is not as attractive. in terms of cost per GB.
The simple cardboard packaging proclaims that the NV1 is 35 times faster than a spinning hard drive, which isn’t a high bar to hit for an SSD. You get a code to claim a free copy of Acronis True Image HD, but it’s printed on the inside of the cardboard sandwich. It’s almost impossible not to miss unless you already know it’s there, and in fact, a lot of people are very likely going to tear it up when opening the package, as there’s nothing to indicate anything important. is inside. The software allows you to clone or image a drive, but it does not support incremental backups, schedule, cloud or mobile backups, etc. like the commercial versions of True Image.
Kingston NV1 SSD Features and Specifications
Kingston doesn’t claim extraordinary performance out of the NV1, but simply aims to deliver high capabilities at a low price. What’s most remarkable about this SSD series, according to trusted source AnandTech, is that Kingston doesn’t specify exactly which controller you’ll get or even what kind of flash memory – in order to balance cost and inventory, the company could exchange components. in different lots, and the only guarantees you have are that they will meet the advertised performance and endurance.
Other companies have been found swapping out components after SSDs launched (and reviews are published) without saying anything, and although Kingston hasn’t exactly expressed loud and clear their intention to do the same when of the NV1 publicity, he was at least frank with the media that reported this fact.
This of course makes it difficult to evaluate a product, as you might end up with something significantly different if you make your purchase a month or two later, and there is no guarantee that the unit of rating sent to Gadgets 360 will even match what’s on the market right now. That said, Kingston is a known and trusted brand, and that alone is enough for many buyers. If you don’t care about TLC vs QLC flash and controller bandwidth, and find the capacity you need at a good price, you should be pretty happy.
Kingston claims sequential reads of 2100 Mbps and sequential writes of 1700 Mbps for all three capacities. This SSD uses PCIe 3.0 and not the faster and newer 4.0 standard. Endurance is rated at 120TB, 240TB, and 480TB for 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB capacities respectively. MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) is 1.5 million hours. Those numbers are all far lower than what the Kingston KC2500, introduced earlier this year, offers. Even the previous entry-level NVMe model, the A2000, offers significantly better endurance ratings.
It was not possible to identify the specific controller and type of flash on my review unit without peeling off the label covering the actual chips on the module, and Kingston has not released these details. Some third-party reports suggest that low capacity drives will use TLC flash while higher ones will use QLC flash, but that could change at any time. We cannot verify what the bandwidth of the controller is, but we can safely assume that there is no DRAM cache. There is also no mention of encryption on the official datasheet. We will have to rely solely on performance to rate this drive.
The Kingston NV1 is a very basic SSD so it doesn’t come with a heat sink. The circuit board itself is bright blue and looks quite nice, but you won’t see much of it once installed. Since it is a one-sided M.2 module and is only 2.1mm thick, it will fit into tight spaces such as ultra-thin laptops.
Kingston NV1 SSD Performance.
The Kingston NV1 was evaluated on an open platform consisting of >>>>. All Windows updates and drivers were the most recent released versions at the time of this review. Windows reported that the formatted capacity of the drive was 465.75 GB.
Starting with CrystalDiskMark 6, we saw sequential read and write speeds of 2,553Mbps and 1,959Mbps respectively, which is a bit higher than I expected based on official specs. This could be a built-in cushion so that future revisions remain within the announced performance threshold. Random reads and writes were measured at 1370.6MBps and 1447.4MBps, which is not bad at all. That’s much faster than today’s premium SATA SSDs like the Samsung SSD 870 Evo, but behind the impressive Kingston KC2500.
The Anvil benchmark reported read and write scores of 4,674.33 and 6,827.63 respectively, for a total of 11,501.96. In an actual Windows file copy test using an 80GB folder of assorted files, the write speed hit 345MB / s and was fairly stable at around this level with very large files, but dropped. up to 15MB / s with assorted small files.
It should be noted that even the latest version of Kingston’s SSD Manager software, downloaded from its website, did not detect this drive. It was unable to display diagnostic information or security-related options.
Questions remain about the long term viability of the Kingston NV1. I wouldn’t use it as a boot drive for my primary work PC or store my most important data there without a solid backup plan in place, but that doesn’t mean no one else should choose it. . It would be a great inexpensive upgrade for an older PC or laptop that meets non-critical needs, and it could also be a great secondary or tertiary drive for saving large game install files as they will benefit from fast charges.
What makes it most attractive is its low price, but even so, there are other more affordable models with unambiguous specs, including the Crucial P1 and WD Blue SN550. Kingston’s own A2000 only costs Rs. 100-200 more. Since this model is quite new to the Indian market, I hope to see much better prices in a few months. This SSD effectively creates a new lower level of product, so with the right price, it can definitely carve out a niche for itself.
That said, the performance is pretty good and the endurance should be good enough for most low impact PC use cases at home and in the office. You’d save quite a bit of money compared to something mainstream like the Kingston KC2500 or the Samsung SSD 970 Evo Plus.
500 GB: Rs. 5,499
1TB: Rs. 9,499
2 TB: Rs. 24,500
- Good overall performance
- Relatively affordable
- Basic specifications subject to change
- Disappointing endurance ratings
- No encryption
- No management software
Ratings (out of 5)
- Performances: 4
- Value for money: 3.5
- Overall: 3.5