Supreme Court Strikes Down New York’s Concealed Carry Law in Blow to Gun Reform Advocates | Radio-Canada News


The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday declared New York state’s limits on the carrying of concealed handguns in public unconstitutional, delivering a historic victory for gun rights advocates in a deeply divided country. on how to deal with armed violence.

The 6-3 ruling, with the court’s conservative justices in the majority and liberal justices dissenting, found that state law, enacted in 1913, violated a person’s right to “hold and wear weapons” under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In an opinion written by Judge Clarence Thomas, judges overturned a lower court ruling dismissing a challenge to the law by two gun owners and the New York branch of the influential National Rifle Association. gun rights advocates closely aligned with Republicans.

New York’s restriction is unconstitutional because it “prevents law-abiding citizens with ordinary needs of self-defense from exercising their right to own and bear arms,” ​​Thomas said.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul called the decision “outrageous” given the “national gun violence reckoning” now unfolding following the mass shootings in Buffalo, NY, and Uvalde, Texas.

See also  Heathfield High School: Ombudsman and teacher file assault complaints against each other

“In response to this decision, we are closely considering our options, including calling a special session of the legislature,” Hochul said.

The recent mass shootings have galvanized Senate lawmakers, who are closer to bipartisan gun reform for the first time in decades at the federal level. A vote in the hemicycle could take place as early as Thursday.

The 80-page bipartisan Safer Communities Act would encourage states to keep guns away from those deemed dangerous and tighten background checks on potential gun buyers convicted of domestic violence or crimes serious as minors.

It does not include the more sweeping gun control measures favored by Democrats, including US President Joe Biden, such as banning assault rifles or high-capacity magazines.

Judges Steven Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotamayor disagreed with the decision.

See also  Star chef Jean-Christophe Novelli, 61, says don't put people down; build them

Breyer listed a number of recent mass shootings, including in Buffalo, in his lengthy dissent, but in an agreement Judge Samuel Alito questioned its relevance.

“The New York law at issue in this case obviously did not stop this perpetrator,” Alito said.

New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, a Republican, hailed the decision as a corrective to “New York’s shameful attempt to shred New Yorkers’ Second Amendment rights.”

Supreme Court’s Most Important Gun Ruling in Years

The ruling represents the court’s most significant statement on gun rights in more than a decade. In 2008, the court first recognized an individual’s right to keep firearms in their home for self-defense in a District of Columbia case, and in 2010 it applied that right to the states.

The new ruling underscored how strongly the 6-3 conservative majority on the court favors a broad reading of Second Amendment rights.

WATCH l Senators hail progress on package of gun laws:

Gun control bill clears first hurdle in US Senate

Some Republicans have joined Democrats in voting for a gun control bill in the US Senate that is now expected to pass the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives by the end of the week.

See also  SGPC to install portrait of ex-Punjab CM assassin in Golden Temple Museum

Under New York law’s “just cause” requirement, applicants seeking an unrestricted concealed carry permit must convince a state firearms licensing officer of a need real, rather than speculative, self-defense. Officials could also grant licenses limited to certain activities, such as hunting or target shooting.

The decision could lead to many more people obtaining licenses to carry concealed handguns in the state, undermine similar restrictions in other states, and jeopardize other types of state and local restrictions on firearms. fire nationwide by forcing judges to scrutinize them with a more skeptical eye under the Constitution. .

“”ghosts” assembled from components purchased online.

They also feared that such a move would undermine gun bans in sensitive places such as airports, courthouses, hospitals and schools.

Read the US Supreme Court decision:


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here